-
Shareholder disputes in a closely held business threaten the business and personal financial interests of the owner.
-
New Jersey law provides the owners of a closely held corporation with rights and remedies that assure access to information and the financial benefits of ownership.
-
Closely held corporations can use effective planning and negotiated solutions to avoid litigation.
Shareholder disputes are often disruptive, emotional, and, if left unresolved, devastating to the closely held corporations that are the backbone of New Jersey’s economy. When these disagreements arise in the closely held business with only a handful of key stakeholders, they can escalate quickly, placing the company’s operations — and the persona futures of the owners — at risk.
Shareholder Disputes: It Isn’t Just Business, It’s Personal
Shareholder disputes aren’t just about financial disagreements—they often stem from deeply personal frustrations, competing visions, or the inherent complexity of running a business where power and resources are shared by just a few individuals.
Understanding the common causes of these disputes—and the legal remedies available—can make the difference between a resolution that preserves the business and a breakdown that leads to its dissolution.
The Common Causes of Shareholder Disputes
Every closely held corporation is unique, but the disputes they face tend to follow familiar patterns. Recognizing these common issues is the first step in addressing them effectively.
Deadlocks That Paralyze Decision-Making
In many small corporations, shareholders also serve as directors or officers. When they hold equal voting power, disagreements over major decisions can lead to a stalemate.
- Typical areas of conflict:
- Expanding or diversifying the business.
- Approving significant expenditures or loans.
- Hiring or firing key employees.
- Why it matters: Deadlocks can prevent the corporation from taking action, leading to missed opportunities and operational paralysis.
Financial Disputes
Disputes over money are among the most common and contentious issues in shareholder relationships.
- Key causes:
- Arguments over whether profits should be distributed or reinvested in the business.
- Accusations of financial mismanagement or misuse of corporate funds.
- Perceived inequities in compensation or benefits among shareholder employees.
- The fallout: Financial disagreements erode trust, often spilling over into other areas of the business relationship.
Oppression of Minority Shareholders
In closely held corporations, majority shareholders often control key decisions. Minority shareholders can feel excluded, ignored, or treated unfairly.
- Examples of oppression:
- Denying access to financial records.
- Refusing to pay dividends while majority shareholders receive salaries or perks.
- Diluting minority shares to reduce their ownership stake.
- Legal relevance: Minority shareholders in New Jersey have legal protections against oppressive conduct, giving them the right to seek remedies in court.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Shareholders in positions of power owe fiduciary duties to the corporation and their fellow shareholders. When they act in their own self-interest, the results can be devastating.
- Common breaches:
- Self-dealing, such as directing corporate opportunities to a separate business.
- Misappropriating corporate funds or assets.
- Failing to disclose conflicts of interest.
- The risk: Breaches of fiduciary duty often lead to lawsuits, with significant financial and reputational consequences.
Disputes Over Share Transfers
Closely held corporations often restrict the sale or transfer of shares to maintain control within a trusted group. Disagreements arise when a shareholder wishes to leave or sell their interest.
- Challenges:
- Valuing the departing shareholder’s interest.
- Determining who has the right to buy the shares.
- Ensuring the transaction complies with any buy-sell agreements.
What are the Legal Remedies for Shareholder Disputes?
When shareholder disputes threaten the stability of a corporation, there are an array of legal remedies can provide a path forward for the owners. The right solution depends on the nature of the conflict and the goals of the parties involved.
Negotiation and Mediation: The First Step
In many cases, disputes can be resolved without resorting to litigation. Mediation allows shareholders to work through their differences with the help of a neutral third party, while negotiation between attorneys can help reach a mutually acceptable solution.
- Benefits:
- Cost-effective and confidential.
- Preserves relationships, which is especially important in small corporations.
Enforcing Shareholder Agreements
Well-drafted shareholder agreements often include provisions for resolving disputes. These agreements may:
- Define buyout terms and valuation methods.
- Establish procedures for voting or tie-breaking.
- Require disputes to be resolved through arbitration or mediation.
Minority Shareholder Oppression Claims
New Jersey law provides remedies for minority shareholders who face oppression by the majority. Potential remedies include:
- Ordering the majority to buy out the minority’s shares at fair value.
- Appointing a custodian or provisional director to oversee corporate management.
- Dissolving the corporation if no other remedy is sufficient.
Litigation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
When a shareholder’s misconduct harms the corporation or its stakeholders, litigation may be necessary to hold them accountable. Courts can:
- Remove directors or officers found to have breached their duties.
- Order restitution for financial harm caused by the breach.
- Impose other remedies to restore trust and protect the corporation.
Judicial Dissolution: A Last Resort
When disputes cannot be resolved and the corporation is no longer viable, shareholders can petition the court for judicial dissolution. This process involves liquidating the corporation’s assets and distributing the proceeds among shareholders.
Preventing Disputes Before They Start
While not all disputes can be avoided, proactive planning can reduce the likelihood of conflict.
1. Create Comprehensive Shareholder Agreements
A shareholder agreement should address key areas of potential conflict, including:
- Rules for transferring shares.
- Voting procedures and tie-breaking mechanisms.
- Dispute resolution processes.
2. Foster Transparency and Communication
Regular shareholder meetings, open communication, and access to financial information build trust and reduce the chances of misunderstandings.
3. Plan for Exits
Buy-sell agreements and clear exit strategies help ensure smooth transitions when shareholders leave the corporation.
Conclusion: Resolving Shareholder Disputes in New Jersey
Shareholder disputes in closely held corporations are complex, but they don’t have to spell the end of your business. By understanding the common causes of these conflicts and the legal options available, shareholders can navigate disputes effectively, protecting their rights and their company’s future.
If you’re facing a shareholder dispute, whether it’s a deadlock, financial disagreement, or an allegation of oppression, Jay McDaniel and the Business Divorce Practice Group at Weiner Law Group can help. With decades of experience handling disputes in New Jersey, we provide the legal guidance and advocacy you need to achieve a favorable resolution.
Contact Jay McDaniel today to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward resolving your shareholder dispute.