The controlling shareholders of a corporation owe fiduciary duties to the minority shareholders by virtue of their ability to control the affairs of the company. Even when a merger complies with statutory requirements, where it benefits the controlling shareholders and does not have an apparent business purpose, it must also…
Articles Posted in Minority Oppression
Business Judgment Rule Trumps Oppression; Minority Shareholder Entitled to Attorney’s Fees in Defense of Counterclaim
The business judgment rule insulates decisions made in good faith and in the best interests of the enterprise from being subject to judicial second guessing ordinary business decisions Majority shareholders that failed to pay dividends to a non-employee minority shareholders in valid exercise of business judgment rule did not…
Single Business or Amalgamation Theory Applies to Related Businesses
The Single Business Theory permits a court to treat related businesses as though they were one enterprise. Courts apply the single business theory in rare cases to prevent injustice. Pertuis v. Front Roe Rests., Inc., 2018 S.C. LEXIS 85 (2018) Statutes: S.C. Code Ann. § 33-18-420; S.C. Code Ann. §…
Shareholder Oppression is Frustration of Minority Shareholder’s Reasonable Expectations
This seminal case by the New Jersey Supreme Court identifies minority oppression as the frustration of a shareholder’s reasonable expectations. A court may order the compelled purchase of a shareholder’s interest as a remedy for shareholder oppression when it is the only practical alternative to judicial dissolution. The minority shareholder…
Failure to Object to Business Practices Waives Minority Shareholder Rights
Digital Camera International, Ltd. v. Antebi, et al., 11-cv-1823 (E.D.N,.Y. July 13, 2017) Statutes: N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7(1)(c) Facts:Shareholders of a New Jersey corporation participated in a variety of activities that would be classified as oppressive behavior, including the payment of persona expenses with corporate funds, operating a competing business, insider contracts…
Minority Shareholder’s Silence Waives Oppression Claim
It was the stuff of which a good minority oppression claim is easily cooked up. The party in control of the corporation had used the corporate bank accounts as his personal piggy bank while operating a competing business, paid himself inflated office rents and bankrolled an extra-marital affair with money…
Oppressed Shareholder Wins $750,000 Fee Award
An oppressed minority shareholder was awarded approximately $750,000 in attorneys fees and expert expenses — some eight times the amount of the buyout — even though the majority had good reason to fire him from his position as the corporation’s CEO. Fee Award Under Oppressed Shareholder Statute to Selling Shareholder…
Valuation of Corporation in Oppressed Shareholder Includes Marketability Discount
The general rule is that a court should not apply discounts for marketability or lack of control (the later known as the minority discount) unless there is some unfairness or wrongdoing among the parties. Still, in the world of oppressed minority shareholder litigation, there is always some allegation of wrongdoing,…
Seven Business Litigation Best Practices that Address the Lack of Civil Trials
Here is the hard reality. The chances that your case, or any case, will get to a real trial on the merits is way less than one in 10. The truth is that only between two and five cases out of 100 will be resolved with a trial. What does…
An Apology at the Bargaining Table
One of the hardest things about being an effective negotiator is the ability to leave your ego at the door. We need to listen, not impress. Seasoned Negotiators, Effective Apologies As negotiation trainer Jim Camp warns, an effective negotiator learns how to let the other side be “ok,” even when…